|
In networking, a basic principal of next-generation standards is
that
they should be backward compatible with the installed base. For example,
the 802.11g Wi-Fi standard was designed to allow older 802.11b
nodes and newer 802.11g nodes to coexist on the same channel. In
contrast, the earlier 802.11a standard failed to address interoperability
with 802.11b networks and was rejected in most segments of the market in favor of 802.11g.
Unfortunately,
the path from fixed to mobile WiMAX is following the 802.11a
example. During the development of 802.16e, which specifically
addresses mobility, it became clear that the OFDM-256 PHY used
in fixed WiMax could not meet the requirements of mobile
applications. And unlike the 802.11b/802.11a situation, there
was no
installed base of fixed WiMax when this decision was made.
Meanwhile,
South Korea is leading the charge to mobility with WiBRO,
which is expected to become a WiMAX profile under 802.16e.
Service-provider KT plans to launch WiBRO service in April
2006 in the cities
of Seoul and In-Cheon. Korea is expected to have about two
million
WiBRO subscribers in 2007, growing to nearly 10 million in
2011. With
mobile WiMAX stealing the spotlight, where does this leave
fixed WiMAX?
Overshadowed
But Not Forgotten
Because the
WiMAX fixed and mobile PHYs are fundamentally incompatible, the
two versions will be deployed in different
applications. Broadband wireless access (BWA) is one application
touted for fixed WiMAX. WiMAX evangelists would have you believe
fixed WiMAX can deliver triple-play (voice/video/data) services,
just
like DSL or cable. But a WiMAX channel is a shared medium, and
current profiles for licensed bands deliver a maximum downlink
speed
of 26Mbps at the PHY layer. After MAC overhead, WiMAX can carry
perhaps three standard TV streams or a single HDTV stream. This
bandwidth is not enough for a single home, much less a large number
of subscribers.
Although
it is unlikely to compete directly with DSL and cable, WiMax
will be an attractive alternative where no DSL or cable-modem
service
is available. In rural areas of China and India, for example,
WiMAX
could deliver voice and data services without the need to lay
copper
or fiber cabling. WiMAX equipment can be installed at one location
in
a community, and other technologies such as Wi-Fi can be used
to
distribute services locally. In this way, the relatively high
cost of
the WiMAX equipment is amortized across many users.
Fixed
WiMAX is also attractive as a backhaul technology for cellular
networks, allowing new cell sites to be installed in rural areas
without cabling. WiMAX can also upgrade existing cell sites that
served by copper T1/E1/J1 lines, which are becoming a bottleneck
for
3G data services. In some areas, WiMAX could be less expensive
than
running fiber to these sites.
WiMAX
Chips Ease Equipment Designs
What makes
fixed WiMAX attractive for equipment designers is the availability
of application-specific chips. A number of vendors
offer
system-on-chip (SoC) products that implement OFDM-256 baseband
and
802.16 MAC functions. A separate set of vendors offers WiMAX radio
transceivers for various bands.
Intel
is a high-profile supporter of WiMAX, and the company was first
to market an SoC device. The PRO/Wireless 5116 integrates all
of
the
digital functions for a fixed-WiMAX CPE design. The highly
programmable chip includes a pair of ARM9 CPUs for MAC and upper-PHY
processing as well as a DSP for the modem. A 10/100 Ethernet
port
provides the connection to a PC or router.
Fujitsu
is the second major chip vendor to offer a WiMAX SoC. The SoC
includes a pair of CPUs for the MAC function, while the modem
is
implemented in hardware. Like Intel’s chip, Fujitsu’s
MB87M3400 can
be used as the heart of a CPE design. Unlike Intel’s chip,
the
Fujitsu device can also be used in base-station designs. In this
case, the MAC software runs on an external processor.
French
startup Sequans Communications sampled its first chip in September
2005. The company’s WiMAX SoC provides a number
of features
not found in the Intel and Fujitsu designs. Wavesat offers a WiMAX
PHY chip plus MAC intellectual property. PicoChip Designs offers
a
software-defined PHY implementation running on a massively parallel
DSP chip.
WiMAX-specific
radios are now available from both large and small vendors. Texas
Instruments offers chips for all three WiMAX bands:
2.5GHz, 3.5GHz, and 5.8GHz. Radio specialists RF Magic and Sierra
Monolithics (SMI) were the first vendors to offer merchant WiMAX
radio chips. Better known for Wi-Fi power amplifiers, SiGe
Semiconductor now offers WiMAX transceiver chips as well.
Using
these commercially available devices, OEMs and ODMs can design
fixed-WiMAX equipment with relative ease. This approach allows
the
equipment vendor to focus on designing equipment to meet a
specific
need. Even low-volume applications can be targeted due to the
moderate cost of developing a complete system. Thus, these
highly
integrated chips will enable fixed WiMAX to find a home in
many
different applications.
Originally published in Nikkei
Electronics Asia,
December 2005
© 2002-2005 The Linley Group
|